Posted tagged ‘government 2.0’

E-Learning Provocateur: Volume 2

17 September 2012

Following the modest success of my first book, I decided to fulfil the promise of its subtitle and publish E-Learning Provocateur: Volume 2.

The volume comprises a collation of my articles from this blog. As in the first volume, my intent is to provoke deeper thinking across a range of e-learning related themes in the workplace, including:

E-Learning Provocateur: Volume 2•   social business
•   informal learning
•   mobile learning
•   microblogging
•   data analysis
•   digital influence
•   customer service
•   augmented reality
•   the role of L&D
•   smartfailing
•   storytelling
•   critical theory
•   ecological psychology
•   online assessment
•   government 2.0
•   human nature

Order your copy now at Amazon.

2010: My blogging year recapped

28 December 2010

As 2010 draws to a close, I thought I’d take a moment to recap my blog posts during the year.

I hope you take the opportunity to read any that you may have missed.

Oh, and please leave a comment or two or three…!

Tag cloud for the E-Learning Provocateur blog in 2010.

Learning theory & instructional design

Taxonomy of Learning Theories•  Taxonomy of Learning Theories
•  Theory-informed instructional design tips
•  The two faces of blended learning
•  Style counsel
Style counsel•  Art vs (Information) Science

Informal learning

How to revamp your learning model•  My award-winning IQ
•  Online courses must die!
•  The ILE and the FLE in harmony
•  How to revamp your learning model
•  Open Learning Network vs ILE

Social media

How not to do social media•  Social media: It’s not about the technology!
•  Social media: Prevention is better than cure
•  The 4 lessons Kid Fury teaches us
•  I stand corrected
•  How not to do social media
Why Gowalla should merge with Foursquare•  Why Gowalla should merge with Foursquare
•  Sharing is caring

Knowledge management

Art vs (Information) Science•  Art vs (Information) Science
•  Erin doesn’t get it

Government 2.0

I stand corrected•  London, New York, Parramatta
•  I stand corrected


Thickness of skin required•  Thickness of skin required
•  Greetings from the E-Learning Provocateur
•  Sharing is caring


The age of the e-book•  The age of the e-book
•  The end of publishing as we know it


The elephant in the room•  The elephant in the room
•  Shades of green
•  The Melbourne Cup: it’s not about the horses!


My 1-liners from TEDxCanberra 2010•  My 1-liners from LearnX 2010
•  My 1-liners from TEDxCanberra 2010


Campus firestarter•  The ingredients of intelligence
•  Campus firestarter
•  A short history of spam
•  Thickness of skin required
•  Trending: Sydney
•  Selective tolerance

Confucius 2.0Miscellaneous

•  Confucius 2.0
•  Green e-learning
•  Honest football
•  The two types of augmented reality
Allergic to ATNA•  Swimming against the tide
•  Square pegs and round holes
•  Facts are a bitch
•  Smartfailing the vintage future
•  Allergic to ATNA

I stand corrected

8 November 2010

I wasn’t impressed at this month’s SMCSYD meeting.

I mean, it was professionally organised and delivered as always, but I just didn’t buy into what the presenters were saying.

The topic was How can social media analysis help predict results? and several highly regarded social media strategists recounted their work in mining Twitter and other online forums leading up to the Australian election.

The central message was: Look, there are heaps of voters on Twitter. If we can sample their sentiment, and combine that data with how well we think the two major parties are campaigning online, we should be able to predict who will win the election.

Twitter birdI didn’t just scoff, I tweeted:

I don't know about this. Most twitterati are staunchly leftwing. Will twitter use really affect their votes?

My rationale was that if most people on Twitter lean heavily to the left, so will their vote, and nothing stated or debated on Twitter will change that. Therefore the Twittersphere is not representative of the broader citizenry, so any analysis of it will be redundant.

Someone following the #smcsyd hashtag politely challenged my assumption that most Twitterati are staunchly leftwing. Fair enough, but when a photo of Tony Abbot in his budgie smugglers elicited sneers and giggles from the audience, I knew I was on the right track.

Then something unexpected happened… one of the presenters showed us how his analysis predicted an even result. This is impressive not only because I didn’t see it coming, but also because the election result was so tight that it produced a hung Parliament.


How did that happen?!

Was Tony Abbot’s online engagement so effective that it shored up his stats against the lefty chatter? No – the presenters claimed his social media campaign was poor.

In that case, if my assumption was correct, the analysis should have predicted a landslide victory for Labor. The fact it didn’t happen could only mean one thing: my assumption was wrong.


OK, I decided to take a dose of my own medicine and collect some facts. So I ran a strawpoll comprising one simple question:

How left-wing or right-wing are you?

I provided five response options on a Likert scale: Very Left, Left, Center, Right or Very Right.

With some retweeting help from my twiends, I received a grand total of 20 responses. Not very scientific, I know, but here are the results nonetheless:

Strawpoll results: Very Left 10%, Left 35%, Center 15%, Right 40%, Very Right 0%

As you can see, my tiny sample of the Twitterati is uncannily balanced. Not only does a substantial proportion of the population consider itself politically centered, but a large proportion considers itself right-wing.

So why did I think the Twitterati were a bunch of tree-hugging GMF-fearing border-opening closet communists?

Upon reflection, I think one reason is that the only political tweets I ever seem to see are left leaning. Why that is the case, I do not know. It might just be coincidence.

Another reason, however, is that the Q&A TV show seems to televise mostly left-wing tweets. Heaven forbid I accuse Australia’s ABC of bias, although others more illustrious than me have done so in the past. More likely Q&A attracts a strong left-wing following, and I suppose that subconsciously influenced my view of the Twitterati in general.

Cartoon straightening out the left bias of the ABC's Bananas in Pyjamas

Anyway, something that one of the SMCSYD presenters said that I whole-heartedly agree with is that the Twittersphere is a niche demographic.

This view is supported by the analysis which isolated the hottest subjects of discussion as being the National Broadband Network and the proposed Internet Filter. Of course people who spend time online are going to have a heightened interest in these issues.

So while the rest of the public probably couldn’t care less, Twitter is clearly an important battleground in the war that is politics.

Pollies take note!

London, New York, Parramatta

19 October 2010

Connie Malamed recently drew my attention to the How Do I Become President? challenge at

How Do I Become President?A humorous take on the How Do I Become President? challenge.

It’s a competition for kids to create an infographic or poster that explains the process of becoming the President of the United States.

Not only will the winner receive a cash prize, but their poster will be distributed to schools and libraries across the country.

What a wonderful example of Government 2.0!

It’s not just about engaging the public and empowering them to participate; it’s also about educating our children.

<insert warm fuzzy feeling here>

Down under

This got me thinking about Government 2.0 efforts closer to home.

Australian Government logoI have discovered that the Australian Government has released a wonderfully poetic Declaration of Open Government upon the recommendation of a Government 2.0 Taskforce.

Indeed, four federal offices have launched a Government 2.0 initiative in the past couple of years.

Curiously, however, all were launched prior to the declaration and none since!

Uncurrent state

The State Government appears to be in “thinking about it” mode.

NSW Government logoApart from the ever adventurous Powerhouse Museum and a Government 2.0 in NSW event last year, ten or so minutes of googling on my part couldn’t find any other Government 2.0 initiatives sponsored by New South Wales.

OK, I didn’t try very hard, but it shouldn’t be that difficult… right?

That would defeat the whole purpose!

Think global, act local

PCC logoCruising further down the food chain, I sought inspiration from my local government, Parramatta City Council…


I was pleasantly surprised to find ParraConnecta new “connected city and community” framework designed to link existing programs as well as foster the development of new digital initiatives in the local public sphere.

Hmm… sounds interesting.

ParraConnect homepage

Plenty of progressive ideas are touted on the website, such as:

  • Wireless CBD precinct

  • Digital economy portal linking local companies, skills, needs, training and opportunities

  • Hot desk hubs and hyperlocal smartwork centres

  • ICT training for small businesses

  • E-Learning for seniors

  • A smartphone app that finds parking (a big problem in Parramatta!)

  • Apps4Parra competitions and hackfests.

But who’s to say this isn’t just another case of all talk, no action?

Well I’m heartened by the release of an impressive iPhone app called DigiMacq which scaffolds a self-guided multimedia tour of Parramatta’s historical sites.

The DigiMacq app on the iPhoneYes, it’s available now.

These guys are serious.

Smart city

As both a rate payer and an e-learning & social media professional, I have my own ideas about how the council can act locally to lead the nation (and dare I say the world?) in Government 2.0.

With the right people heeding the right advice deploying the right technologies, I’m sure we can convert the dream of a digitally connected city into a reality.

London and New York, stand aside. Parramatta is coming through!

Connected city