Square pegs and round holes
What’s your role in the workplace?
How does that compare to what you do on a day-to-day basis?
I ask you this because what we think we should be doing and what we actually find ourselves doing are often two very different things.
That concerns me because I’ve been blogging a lot about a revamped learning model which relies heavily on Web 2.0 technologies to support informal learning.
In the back of my mind, I realise that revolutionising the learning model in this way would shock some organisations.
To work effectively in those environments, the model would demand significant shifts in roles and responsibilities away from the status quo, towards what I suggest the employees should be doing instead.
Allow me to elaborate…
The role of the learner
In my view, every employee has the obligation to drive their own development.
An Informal Learning Environment (ILE) empowers them to do just that. It’s a space where they can explore content, ask questions, and seek help from their peers.
This relieves the L&D professional from alternately spoonfeeding and coercing grown adults into doing what they should be doing for and among themselves.
In short: the role of learning should be assigned to the learner.
The role of the subject matter expert
Taking the logic one step further, every employee also has the obligation to share their knowledge with their colleagues.
Web 2.0 empowers them to do just that. With tools like blogs, wikis and discussion forums, they can contribute content, participate in the conversation, and keep everyone up to speed in their domain.
This relieves the L&D professional from developing and managing content over which they have no authority.
In short: the role of knowledge sharing should be assigned to the SME.
The role of the manager
Must it be said that every manager has the obligation to manage the development of their own staff..?
With the help of their subject matter experts, managers should identify required competencies, assess proficiencies, assign development goals, fund and approve training, and hold regular development discussions.
This relieves the L&D professional from getting bogged down in technical matters over which – again – they have no authority.
In short: the role of managing the team should be assigned to the manager.
The role of the L&D professional
So if the L&D professional is no longer responsible for babysitting and strong-arming employees, conjuring content, and doing the managers’ jobs for them, what on Earth are they responsible for?
The answer is plenty, including consulting, training needs analysis, instructional design, developing content for which they are the expert (eg development plan templates, development discussion workshops), facilitation, community management, training evaluation, research and governance.
In short: the L&D professional supports the learners, subject matter experts and managers in playing their parts to improve the capability and performance of the organisation.
In the 99% of organisations in which a greenfield opportunity does not exist, my revamped learning model represents a paradigm revolution.
Given legacy systems, entrenched practices and perhaps a less-than-booming corporate culture, successful implementation would require skillful change management to say the least, not to mention a lengthy, multi-phased rollout period.
Dare I suggest the new paradigm may also prompt a review of the organisation’s recruitment criteria?
Tags: change management, enterprise 2.0, ILE, implementation, informal learning, informal learning environment, leadership, learning management, learning model, participatory culture, roles, social learning, web 2.0You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.